Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Biscayne (resort)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 02:09, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Camp Biscayne (resort)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability for 5 years; couldn't establish notability Boleyn (talk) 16:35, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Quaint little resort, no hint of notability. Most the article is advertised as being a WP:COPYVIO. -- BenTels (talk) 18:49, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 22:29, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 22:29, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep extremely notable former Miami institution that helped the development of the city, covered by plenty of reliable sources, part of The Barnacle which is in the National Register of Historic Places. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Biscayne. Secret ^account 15:41, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep since it's among the development of the area that later became The Barnacle Historic State Park. It sounds like it has historic significance. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 22:58, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:22, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 03:54, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Adequately sourced; NRHP connection cited above by Secret adds weight to the Keep case, in my view. Carrite (talk) 18:31, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have requested that the article be moved to Camp Biscayne, which currently redirects to Camp Biscayne (resort). Sorry if this causes any confusion. Boleyn (talk) 18:57, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I deleted the guest list. Secret deleted the big blurb copied from the brochure. I added a standard reference layout and one citation. I'll add a couple of more citations. GroveGuy (talk) 20:36, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Appears to satisfy notability now; while much work is still needed, WP:NOTCLEANUP. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:46, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is the only public source on a really important part of Cocoanut Grove history, which is a really important part of Miami history. I'm REALLY put out with GroveGuy for removing the guest list because that is really, really interest. A lot of famous people of the era stayed at Camp Biscayne and removing this basically removes knowledge of that. The Barnacle Historic State Park use to have a hotel register for a few years on exhibit and always talked about Alexaner Graham Bell staying there but they never mentioned all the other famous people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.253.64.157 (talk)

Keep as notable along Carrite's reasoning above. --Lockley (talk) 18:24, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.